> If you think that misinterpreting the information about what the 'tunnelling' proposed by EH (in their report) meant for Silbury doesn't make you look a tiny bit silly then fair enough....
So did your informant report back to you verbatim? Did she have a Dictaphone? She was talking most of the way through it...
And does it make me look silly? I didn't say anything throughout! Ah! I get it! Against the ropes... Resort to insults. Fair enough. I'll leave you to it.
G x
 This topic is locked | Posted by goffik 26th November 2005ce 20:42 |
Silbury Round One (Ishmael, Nov 26, 2005, 15:53)- Re: Silbury Round One (Ishmael, Nov 26, 2005, 19:05)
- Re: Silbury Round One (smallblueplanet, Nov 26, 2005, 19:45)
- Re: Silbury Round One (Hob, Nov 26, 2005, 21:42)
- Re: Silbury Round One (nigelswift, Nov 26, 2005, 22:24)
- Re: Silbury Round One (smallblueplanet, Nov 26, 2005, 22:34)
- Re: Silbury Round One (Hob, Nov 26, 2005, 22:57)
- Re: Silbury Round One (Ishmael, Nov 27, 2005, 00:13)
- Re: Silbury Round One (smallblueplanet, Nov 28, 2005, 14:33)
- Please (Ishmael, Nov 27, 2005, 00:15)
- Re: Please (doktoratomik, Nov 28, 2005, 12:48)
- Re: Please (smallblueplanet, Nov 28, 2005, 12:51)
- Re: Please (Rhiannon, Nov 28, 2005, 13:03)
- Re: Please (smallblueplanet, Nov 28, 2005, 13:22)
- Re: Please (nigelswift, Nov 28, 2005, 13:48)
- Re: Please (Ishmael, Nov 28, 2005, 13:55)
- Re: Please (smallblueplanet, Nov 28, 2005, 13:55)
- Re: Please (PeterH, Nov 28, 2005, 14:05)
- Re: Please (Rhiannon, Nov 28, 2005, 14:11)
- Re: Silbury Round One (smallblueplanet, Nov 28, 2005, 14:56)
|
|