"in some cases they were deliberatly placed in inferior positions to show the superior dominance of the new, more powerful religion. The church stood on its cowed and defeated enemy"
That's very persuasive. In some cases, as a minimum. It's part of human nature. Words don't last, and writing's no good for a largely illiterate population, so what better than to write it in stone, symbolically?
It chimes with two of my fantasies. ;)
That Silbury III was a huge high-tech statement of domination by invaders, who sought to build their symbol right on top of the low-tech temple of the losers, Silbury II, entombing their deity forever and using the poor sods as slave labour to do it...
and that Stonehenge was nicked en masse from Avebury and reworked and re-erected elsewhere, again as an act of exquisite humiliation.
Humans can be very unkind.
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 20th August 2005ce 07:54 |
Circles under churches (Littlestone, Apr 28, 2005, 22:10)- Re: Circles under churches (Pete G, Apr 28, 2005, 22:14)
- Re: Circles under churches (FourWinds, Apr 29, 2005, 07:32)
- Re: Circles under churches (Jane, Apr 29, 2005, 09:33)
- Re: Circles under churches (FourWinds, Apr 30, 2005, 08:49)
- Re: Circles under churches (hamish, Apr 30, 2005, 10:07)
- Re: Circles under churches (StoneLifter, May 01, 2005, 17:14)
- Re: Circles under churches (mooncat, May 02, 2005, 16:13)
- Re: Circles under churches (ocifant, May 04, 2005, 20:42)
- Re: Circles under churches (follow that cow, May 07, 2005, 21:43)
- Re: Circles under churches (FourWinds, May 10, 2005, 07:57)
- Re: Circles under churches (FourWinds, May 17, 2005, 21:26)
- Tombs under churches (FourWinds, Jul 07, 2005, 19:38)
- Re: Circles under churches (Littlestone, Aug 17, 2005, 23:09)
- Re: Circles under churches (VenerableBottyBurp, Aug 18, 2005, 01:18)
- Re: Circles under churches (nigelswift, Aug 18, 2005, 06:29)
- Re: Circles under churches (Littlestone, Aug 18, 2005, 10:33)
- Re: Circles under churches (nigelswift, Aug 18, 2005, 10:51)
- Re: Circles under churches (nigelswift, Aug 18, 2005, 11:12)
- Re: Circles under churches (Littlestone, Aug 19, 2005, 00:14)
- Re: Circles under churches (PeterH, Aug 19, 2005, 04:44)
- Re: Circles under churches (nigelswift, Aug 19, 2005, 08:01)
- Re: Circles under churches (Po) (Littlestone, Aug 19, 2005, 18:43)
- Re: Circles under churches (m6, Nov 27, 2005, 16:08)
- Re: Circles under churches (VenerableBottyBurp, Aug 18, 2005, 14:05)
- Re: Circles under churches (PeterH, Aug 18, 2005, 07:01)
- Re: Circles under churches (nigelswift, Aug 18, 2005, 07:47)
- Re: Circles under churches (juamei, Aug 18, 2005, 09:41)
- Re: Circles under churches (PeterH, Aug 18, 2005, 09:51)
- Re: Circles under churches (m6, Nov 27, 2005, 16:45)
- Re: Circles under churches (m6, Nov 27, 2005, 16:46)
- Re: Circles under churches (m6, Nov 27, 2005, 16:47)
- Re: Circles under churches (m6, Nov 27, 2005, 15:44)
- Re: Circles under churches (goffik, Aug 18, 2005, 07:26)
- Re: Circles under churches (dee, Nov 28, 2005, 15:40)
- Re: Circles under churches (andygreyweather, Nov 28, 2005, 22:56)
- Re: Circles under churches (Littlestone, Jan 25, 2007, 16:09)
- Re: Circles under churches (lilydee05, Aug 13, 2007, 22:08)
- Circles under churches: Alphamstone (Littlestone, Oct 11, 2008, 16:36)
- Re: Circles under churches (hotaire, Sep 29, 2009, 08:02)
- Re: Circles under churches (drewbhoy, May 18, 2010, 20:55)
- Re: Circles under churches (Littlestone, May 20, 2010, 10:12)
- Re: Circles under churches (BuckyE, Jun 09, 2010, 13:36)
- Re: Circles under churches (Littlestone, Aug 28, 2017, 13:02)
- Re: Circles under churches (david gregg, Nov 22, 2017, 14:47)
|
|