"Naturally, it's hard for us to address and correct them - which we would have absolutely no reason not to do - unless you tell us the specific matters that have upset you, and how you think they are wrong, and how you think they should be put right <b>and the source from which you derive your contrary facts (since we'd obviously need to check them out, as we always try to do</b>)."
Oh really? .....
>>>> 'I assumed from what was written in TAJ blogs that you'd contacted "official organisations" concerned for their views on certain of the "problems" you highlight??'
>>>Nope. They are merely HA observations and don't pretend to be anything else.
>quote from TAJ ".....another has been left open since September 2004 and >we can't get any information on what's happening. " and "...Enquiries have >been made and no-one seems to know who did it."
>Doesn't this imply you've asked questions? I assumed you'd asked "official >organisations", afterall they're the ones most likely to have answers?
I have no major problem with HA, but if you were interested in giving an informative view of Avebury WHS you could have done your research more thoroughly?
Reply | with quote | Posted by smallblueplanet 24th March 2005ce 11:54 |
The Avebury Journal (Jane, Mar 23, 2005, 15:44)- Re: The Avebury Journal (goffik, Mar 23, 2005, 16:47)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Squid Tempest, Mar 23, 2005, 16:48)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Kammer, Mar 23, 2005, 17:04)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Littlestone, Mar 23, 2005, 17:12)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Vybik Jon, Mar 23, 2005, 17:28)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (StoneLifter, Mar 23, 2005, 18:12)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (smallblueplanet, Mar 23, 2005, 21:50)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (nigelswift, Mar 23, 2005, 22:07)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Jane, Mar 23, 2005, 22:41)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (smallblueplanet, Mar 23, 2005, 23:04)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (nigelswift, Mar 23, 2005, 23:09)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (daveyravey, Mar 24, 2005, 00:05)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Jane, Mar 24, 2005, 09:44)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (smallblueplanet, Mar 24, 2005, 10:14)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Jane, Mar 24, 2005, 10:29)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (smallblueplanet, Mar 24, 2005, 11:01)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (goffik, Mar 24, 2005, 11:24)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (nigelswift, Mar 24, 2005, 11:32)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (smallblueplanet, Mar 24, 2005, 11:54)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (nigelswift, Mar 24, 2005, 12:01)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (doktoratomik, Mar 24, 2005, 12:06)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Jane, Mar 24, 2005, 12:11)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (StoneLifter, Mar 24, 2005, 12:23)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (smallblueplanet, Mar 24, 2005, 12:43)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (FourWinds, Mar 24, 2005, 12:52)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (juamei, Mar 24, 2005, 13:01)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (doktoratomik, Mar 24, 2005, 13:06)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Jane, Mar 24, 2005, 13:10)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (nigelswift, Mar 24, 2005, 14:20)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Kammer, Mar 24, 2005, 16:47)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (ocifant, Mar 24, 2005, 13:08)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Rhiannon, Mar 24, 2005, 12:54)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Pete G, Mar 23, 2005, 22:52)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (FourWinds, Mar 24, 2005, 12:50)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (PeterH, Mar 24, 2005, 17:31)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (VenerableBottyBurp, Mar 24, 2005, 18:34)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (Moth, Mar 25, 2005, 02:10)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (cHARLIE, Mar 25, 2005, 14:53)
- Re: The Avebury Journal (swanvesta, Mar 28, 2005, 11:34)
|
|