While I agree that Silbury climbing should not be tolerated, the traffic argument doesn't hold much water. I mean you might just as logically say that Silbury Hill should be flattened because it makes curious drivers slow down and stare!
 This topic is locked | Posted by doktoratomik
3rd August 2004ce
14:52 |
Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (Ishmael, Aug 02, 2004, 15:46)- Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (doktoratomik, Aug 02, 2004, 16:01)
- Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (scousemaiden, Aug 03, 2004, 00:05)
- Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (Hob, Aug 03, 2004, 01:13)
- Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (nemeton, Aug 03, 2004, 12:37)
- Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (Jane, Aug 03, 2004, 12:55)
- Probably a really stupid thing to say... (Nat, Aug 03, 2004, 14:02)
- Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (nigelswift, Aug 03, 2004, 14:37)
- I glam dicenn them (TomBo, Aug 04, 2004, 12:14)
- Re: I glam dicenn them (doktoratomik, Aug 04, 2004, 12:43)
- Re: I glam dicenn them (Wild Wooder, Aug 04, 2004, 13:00)
- Re: I glam dicenn them (suave harv, Aug 04, 2004, 13:10)
- Re: I glam dicenn them (Cursuswalker, Aug 04, 2004, 17:47)
- Re: I glam dicenn them (Earthstepper, Aug 04, 2004, 18:11)
- Re: I glam dicenn them (nemeton, Aug 04, 2004, 18:17)
- Silbury solutions (Littlestone, Aug 04, 2004, 20:16)
- Bump (Ishmael, Aug 01, 2005, 13:18)
|
|
Log in |
Register
Head To Head 
Re: Lame Ass EH druid @ Silbury (Ishmael)