It's all very thin ice. The Y and Z holes may be younger as measured by analysis of their contents, but the holes themselves are less certain I suppose, except one set of them, I forget which, is definitely younger because of what they cut into.
The thing is, the existence of a hole doesn't preclude the idea that it replaced an earlier smaller hole. All we know is that you can draw a straight line from the centre, through any sarsen and then through it's equivalent x,y and (approximately) Aubrey stone. Why? A construction-related origin seems possible or even another origin but utilized in construction.
Nice though it would be to win that particular argument would it be safer to keep clear of it, and have a "surface" anchor, if you can do it?
Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift 9th September 2003ce 10:40 |
Stone shifting 4 (GordonP, Sep 06, 2003, 23:07)- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Steve Gray, Sep 06, 2003, 23:14)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (GordonP, Sep 06, 2003, 23:45)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 07, 2003, 11:31)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 07, 2003, 20:09)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Steve Gray, Sep 08, 2003, 01:39)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 08, 2003, 07:11)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (nigelswift, Sep 08, 2003, 07:29)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 08, 2003, 07:40)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Moth, Sep 08, 2003, 14:50)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (nigelswift, Sep 08, 2003, 15:00)
- I'll get me wings... (Moth, Sep 08, 2003, 15:09)
- Re: Moth balls (goffik, Sep 09, 2003, 10:43)
- Re: Moth balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 12:08)
- Re: Moth balls (goffik, Sep 09, 2003, 14:21)
- Re: Moth balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 14:44)
- Re: Moth balls (Steve Gray, Sep 09, 2003, 17:23)
- Re: Moth balls (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 17:37)
- Re: Moth balls (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 19:29)
- No balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 20:00)
- Re: New balls, please (goffik, Sep 10, 2003, 07:12)
- Re: New balls, please (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 07:59)
- Re: New balls, please (Moth, Sep 10, 2003, 08:31)
- Re: New balls, please (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 08:52)
- Re: New balls, please (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 08:56)
- Re: New balls, please (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 09:09)
- Jocular snipe (Jane, Sep 10, 2003, 09:17)
- Re: No, but really... (goffik, Sep 10, 2003, 10:32)
- Re: No, but really... (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 11:11)
- Re: No, but really... (Jane, Sep 10, 2003, 12:31)
- Re: No, but really... (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 13:00)
- OK Steve! (Moth, Sep 10, 2003, 11:19)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (jimit, Sep 08, 2003, 15:56)
- Alignment of Holes (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 08:43)
- Re: Alignment of Holes (Steve Gray, Sep 09, 2003, 10:16)
- Re: Alignment of Holes (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 10:40)
- Stone Rowing: remember that? (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 11:49)
- Hole profiles (Steve Gray, Sep 12, 2003, 00:02)
- The Megalith Project Website (nigelswift, Sep 13, 2003, 11:53)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (detect, Sep 21, 2003, 21:06)
|
|