Suppose that you have a large block of stone 1 metre thick, just balanced over the edge of the tower so that its centre of gravity is 1mm beond the edge. It would very slowly begin to topple, but as soon as it starts to move, the centre of gravity moves too because it is half a metre above the pivot point. By the time the stone has rotated by 30 degrees, the centre of gravity has now moved from 1mm to 251mm, so now you've got a considerable turning moment. This makes it very difficult to arrange any kind of controlled descent if you want to end up with the stone at 70 degrees or more.
The angled timbers are a nice idea, but would have to be very strong if you intended them to stop the angular momentum of the stone. Presumably the top end would be supported by the tower. So the tower would have to be able to withstand the side load (7 tons static, but considerably more when stopping the rotation) without the benefit of a vertical load to hold it all together. This is the problem I was discussing with Gordon in relation to his idea of levering off the tower. I prefer the idea of letting the ground stop the stone, and that's why I wanted an angled entry slope to the hole so that the stone could enter deep into the hole while still rotating. Fortunately the Earth has enough mass to stop a 40 ton stone without too much ado. ;-)
I have to go out now, but I'll try to do post some drawings of the proposed methods later on.
Keep up the brainstorming. It's good to have different ideas in the melting pot. Even if an idea is not immediately applicable, it may give rise to one that is.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Steve Gray 8th September 2003ce 10:23 |
Stone shifting 4 (GordonP, Sep 06, 2003, 23:07)- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Steve Gray, Sep 06, 2003, 23:14)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (GordonP, Sep 06, 2003, 23:45)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 07, 2003, 11:31)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 07, 2003, 20:09)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Steve Gray, Sep 08, 2003, 01:39)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 08, 2003, 07:11)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (nigelswift, Sep 08, 2003, 07:29)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 08, 2003, 07:40)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Moth, Sep 08, 2003, 14:50)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (nigelswift, Sep 08, 2003, 15:00)
- I'll get me wings... (Moth, Sep 08, 2003, 15:09)
- Re: Moth balls (goffik, Sep 09, 2003, 10:43)
- Re: Moth balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 12:08)
- Re: Moth balls (goffik, Sep 09, 2003, 14:21)
- Re: Moth balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 14:44)
- Re: Moth balls (Steve Gray, Sep 09, 2003, 17:23)
- Re: Moth balls (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 17:37)
- Re: Moth balls (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 19:29)
- No balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 20:00)
- Re: New balls, please (goffik, Sep 10, 2003, 07:12)
- Re: New balls, please (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 07:59)
- Re: New balls, please (Moth, Sep 10, 2003, 08:31)
- Re: New balls, please (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 08:52)
- Re: New balls, please (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 08:56)
- Re: New balls, please (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 09:09)
- Jocular snipe (Jane, Sep 10, 2003, 09:17)
- Re: No, but really... (goffik, Sep 10, 2003, 10:32)
- Re: No, but really... (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 11:11)
- Re: No, but really... (Jane, Sep 10, 2003, 12:31)
- Re: No, but really... (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 13:00)
- OK Steve! (Moth, Sep 10, 2003, 11:19)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (jimit, Sep 08, 2003, 15:56)
- Alignment of Holes (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 08:43)
- Stone Rowing: remember that? (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 11:49)
- Hole profiles (Steve Gray, Sep 12, 2003, 00:02)
- The Megalith Project Website (nigelswift, Sep 13, 2003, 11:53)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (detect, Sep 21, 2003, 21:06)
|
|