The way I see it is this, if we can lift 40 tons of dead weight with levers, surely we can nudge the top end of 40 tons sideways. levering from the top must be much more efficient than driveing wedges in from the bottom.
Don't ask me why I just know it will work. When the stone has been dropped into the hole and is at rest at something like 70 or 80 degrees there will be a space between the stone and the tower, build the tower up until it is level with the top of the stone, (without the stone on top this will be quick and easy) then fix a fulcrum log across the tower say 6 inches from the stone. Place 6 men on top of the tower who will insert 6 inch diameter levers between the stone and the tower vertically. these men will hold the 12ft levers upright. This will give an advantage of 11 to 1 on each lever. 5 men on ropes attached to the end of each lever will be equal to 55 men. 6 times 55 equals 330 men. More than enough. As the stone is moved upright packings (chalk rubble) is slipped in behind the stone at ground level. Should that almost no time at all.
Reply | with quote | Posted by GordonP 6th September 2003ce 23:45 |
Stone shifting 4 (GordonP, Sep 06, 2003, 23:07)- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Steve Gray, Sep 06, 2003, 23:14)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (GordonP, Sep 06, 2003, 23:45)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 07, 2003, 11:31)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 07, 2003, 20:09)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Steve Gray, Sep 08, 2003, 01:39)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 08, 2003, 07:11)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (nigelswift, Sep 08, 2003, 07:29)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (goffik, Sep 08, 2003, 07:40)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (Moth, Sep 08, 2003, 14:50)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (nigelswift, Sep 08, 2003, 15:00)
- I'll get me wings... (Moth, Sep 08, 2003, 15:09)
- Re: Moth balls (goffik, Sep 09, 2003, 10:43)
- Re: Moth balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 12:08)
- Re: Moth balls (goffik, Sep 09, 2003, 14:21)
- Re: Moth balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 14:44)
- Re: Moth balls (Steve Gray, Sep 09, 2003, 17:23)
- Re: Moth balls (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 17:37)
- Re: Moth balls (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 19:29)
- No balls (Moth, Sep 09, 2003, 20:00)
- Re: New balls, please (goffik, Sep 10, 2003, 07:12)
- Re: New balls, please (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 07:59)
- Re: New balls, please (Moth, Sep 10, 2003, 08:31)
- Re: New balls, please (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 08:52)
- Re: New balls, please (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 08:56)
- Re: New balls, please (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 09:09)
- Jocular snipe (Jane, Sep 10, 2003, 09:17)
- Re: No, but really... (goffik, Sep 10, 2003, 10:32)
- Re: No, but really... (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 11:11)
- Re: No, but really... (Jane, Sep 10, 2003, 12:31)
- Re: No, but really... (Steve Gray, Sep 10, 2003, 13:00)
- OK Steve! (Moth, Sep 10, 2003, 11:19)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (jimit, Sep 08, 2003, 15:56)
- Alignment of Holes (nigelswift, Sep 09, 2003, 08:43)
- Stone Rowing: remember that? (nigelswift, Sep 10, 2003, 11:49)
- Hole profiles (Steve Gray, Sep 12, 2003, 00:02)
- The Megalith Project Website (nigelswift, Sep 13, 2003, 11:53)
- Re: Stone shifting 4 (detect, Sep 21, 2003, 21:06)
|
|