Hi everyone and welcome to stone shifting 2. It's true, I do have two brains! One is under my desk and runs at 2.4GHz, the other is in my skull and works at a tiny fraction of that speed, but is reasonably adept at telling the first one what to do.
Anyway, just to prove that I am fallable, I think I got the explanation wrong for the side forces on the Tower. Here is the revised version: The frictional force (which acts along the surface of the block) and the reaction force of the tower (which acts perpendicularly to the block) resolve to a vertical component that exactly balances with the weight of the block, so there is no side load. However, when the block begins to slip, the frictional force is no longer sufficient to balance the reaction force and the weight. This results in a net side load being imposed on the tower.
To verify this theory, I placed a long wooden lath on top of a tall, narrow support block so that it would just overbalance. As the lath rotated the support block remained upright until the point of slipping was reached. It then imediately fell over.
I'm happy with this new explanation for two reasons. Firstly, the side forces should be a lot less than I had feared and secondly, I couldn't get the maths to work properly before, but now it all falls into place quite nicely.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Steve Gray
26th August 2003ce
17:46 |
Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift, Aug 26, 2003, 17:00)- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (Jane, Aug 26, 2003, 17:16)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (Steve Gray, Aug 26, 2003, 17:46)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (GordonP, Aug 26, 2003, 20:44)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (FourWinds, Aug 27, 2003, 11:24)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift, Aug 29, 2003, 09:10)
- Steve's idea to fix a pivot log under the stone (nigelswift, Aug 30, 2003, 08:24)
- Which Method? (nigelswift, Aug 31, 2003, 07:09)
- Pi in the sky (baza, Aug 31, 2003, 17:44)
- Re: Stone Shifting 2 (jimit, Sep 01, 2003, 19:39)
|
|
Head To Head 
Stone Shifting 2 (nigelswift)