Perhaps we should think about who is depositing this "ritual litter", some of it seems "roman catholic" with statuettes, rocks tied to trees - could it be children. Perhaps there is something to be said for organised religion, at least it has a shape and a creed. The sign if it has to be put should be just over the bridge, as you turn right, it should state simply, those found littering the site with anything but clouties and native flora?? will be fined at least £1000, should put some people off... to be quite honest there are other problems as well, who planted evergreens above the stream, and then used plastic underlay to suppress weeds as well..
Reply | with quote | Posted by moss 27th February 2006ce 09:37 |
Yes. (nigelswift, Feb 07, 2006, 13:48)- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 07, 2006, 15:23)
- Re: No. (goffik, Feb 07, 2006, 18:01)
- Re: No. (goffik, Feb 07, 2006, 18:09)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 08, 2006, 10:37)
- Re: Yes. (cropredy, Feb 08, 2006, 11:01)
- Re: Yes. (juamei, Feb 08, 2006, 13:13)
- Re: Yes. (Jo-anne, Feb 08, 2006, 15:09)
- Re: Yes. (cropredy, Feb 08, 2006, 15:27)
- Re: Yes. (ocifant, Feb 08, 2006, 16:16)
- Re: Yes. (Vybik Jon, Feb 08, 2006, 16:31)
- Re: Yes. (Jo-anne, Feb 08, 2006, 19:14)
- Re: Yes. (ocifant, Feb 08, 2006, 20:11)
- Re: Yes. (ocifant, Feb 08, 2006, 20:12)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 08, 2006, 20:26)
- Re: Yes. (Jo-anne, Feb 08, 2006, 21:29)
- Re: Yes. (FourWinds, Feb 08, 2006, 21:34)
- Re: Yes. (Jo-anne, Feb 08, 2006, 21:39)
- Re: Yes. (FourWinds, Feb 08, 2006, 22:16)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 08, 2006, 21:56)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 08, 2006, 22:03)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 08, 2006, 22:47)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 08, 2006, 23:05)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 09, 2006, 08:35)
- Re: Yes. (FourWinds, Feb 09, 2006, 08:57)
- Re: Yes. (fitzcoraldo, Feb 09, 2006, 09:22)
- Re: Yes. (FourWinds, Feb 09, 2006, 09:35)
- Re: Yes. (fitzcoraldo, Feb 09, 2006, 09:40)
- Re: Yes. (FourWinds, Feb 08, 2006, 22:14)
- Re: Yes. (cropredy, Feb 08, 2006, 22:16)
- Re: Yes. (ocifant, Feb 08, 2006, 22:14)
- Re: Yes. (goffik, Feb 08, 2006, 17:33)
- Re: Yes. (Jo-anne, Feb 08, 2006, 19:05)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 08, 2006, 20:24)
- Re: Yes. (goffik, Feb 08, 2006, 20:43)
- Re: Yes. (goffik, Feb 26, 2006, 21:56)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 26, 2006, 22:46)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 27, 2006, 09:02)
- Re: Yes. (nigelswift, Feb 27, 2006, 09:18)
- Re: Yes. (moss, Feb 27, 2006, 09:37)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 27, 2006, 10:27)
- Re: Yes. (moss, Feb 27, 2006, 11:18)
- Re: Yes. (nigelswift, Feb 27, 2006, 11:34)
- Re: Yes. (goffik, Feb 27, 2006, 11:40)
- Re: Yes. (nigelswift, Feb 27, 2006, 11:47)
- Re: Yes. (goffik, Feb 27, 2006, 11:37)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 27, 2006, 12:29)
- Re: Yes. (ocifant, Feb 27, 2006, 12:46)
- Re: Yes. (Littlestone, Feb 27, 2006, 13:11)
- Re: Yes. (PeterH, Feb 27, 2006, 13:23)
|
|